GrammarNook.
← Confusable Words Index

born” vs. “borne

Use "born" only for passive-voice birth ("was born"); use "borne" for every other sense of "bear," including active-voice birth and all carrying, enduring, or producing senses.

born

"Born" is the past participle of "bear" used specifically and almost exclusively for birth, and only in passive constructions: "she was born in March," "a star is born." It also appears in a handful of fixed figurative idioms about origin or renewal — "born again," "born leader," "born to run" — where the birth metaphor is still doing the underlying work even though nothing literal is being born.

borne

"Borne" is the past participle of "bear" for every other sense of the verb: carrying, enduring, producing, or transmitting. It shows up in "the costs were borne by the company," "she has borne much hardship," "the tree has borne fruit," and in compound adjectives like "airborne," "waterborne," and "tick-borne," all of which describe something carried by a medium.

The real distinction

The rule sounds almost too narrow to be real, but it holds: "born" is reserved for the single sense of birth in the passive voice, and "borne" covers literally every other meaning of the participle of "bear," including active-voice birth constructions ("she has borne three children," using "borne" rather than "born," because the mother is the active subject doing the bearing, not the passive recipient of being birthed). This active-versus-passive-voice distinction in birth contexts specifically is one of the more genuinely subtle points in this whole confusable-word category, and even experienced writers sometimes get it backwards, writing "she has born three children" when the correct form is "borne" precisely because the subject is doing the bearing rather than being born. The compound adjectives (airborne, waterborne, foodborne, bloodborne) always use "borne" without exception, since they describe something being carried or transmitted, never something being given birth to. "Born again" is a genuine, standing exception worth flagging on its own: even though nothing is literally being born, the fixed religious and figurative idiom always uses "born," never "borne," because the birth metaphor (a spiritual rebirth) is doing the conceptual work, and English has simply frozen that idiom in the birth spelling by long-standing convention rather than logic. One more useful check involves possessive-sounding compound adjectives: words like "foreign-born," "American-born," and "native-born" all describe where someone was born and therefore always use "born," never "borne," since they describe the passive birth event itself rather than something being carried, endured, or produced afterward.

Examples with “born

Examples with “borne

Memory trick

Think of "born" as a one-time event stamped on a birth certificate — it only ever means "came into the world," and only in the passive voice. "Borne" is the workhorse form that carries every other job: picture the extra "e" as a little handle, since "borne" is almost always about something being carried, endured, or produced. If the sentence describes a mother actively having children, rather than a child passively coming into being, that active-voice clue means you need "borne," not "born" — a genuinely tricky exception worth double-checking whenever birth and active voice appear in the same sentence. A last quick anchor: compare it to a stamped passport entry versus an ongoing shipment — birth is stamped once and forever with born, while every other kind of carrying, enduring, or bearing keeps racking up borne.

Related confusions

All confusable words