GrammarNook.
← Plural Index

Plural of “tempo

The plural of tempo is tempos (some dictionaries also accept tempi).

Why

"Tempo" is Italian for "time," ultimately from Latin "tempus," and it entered English through musical terminology in the 18th century to describe the speed at which a piece of music should be played. Unlike "piano," another Italian musical loanword that fully regularized to a plain -s plural, "tempo" kept a genuine, still-used Italian plural, "tempi," alongside the English "tempos."

The reason "tempo" retained its Italian plural more strongly than "piano" likely comes down to context of use: professional musicians and conductors reading and discussing classical scores continue to use Italian musical vocabulary in a fairly technical, specialist way (tempo markings, tempo changes within a single piece), keeping "tempi" alive in that specific professional register, while "piano" became a common household object early on and lost that closer tie to ongoing Italian musical practice.

Usage note

In classical music and conducting, especially when discussing shifts between multiple tempo markings within a piece, "tempi" is common and often preferred ("the symphony moves through several distinct tempi"). In general, everyday, and popular-music writing, "tempos" is the more natural and more common choice.

Standard Italian tempo markings, "allegro," "andante," "adagio," remain the international standard on sheet music regardless of a composer's native language, a convention dating to the 17th and 18th centuries when Italian musical practice dominated European composition. The metronome's invention in the early 19th century allowed composers to specify a precise numerical tempo, supplementing the older, more impressionistic Italian tempo words with an exact, measurable figure.

Common real mistakes

Writers outside musical contexts sometimes reach for "tempi" assuming it's simply the more sophisticated choice, when "tempos" is perfectly correct and often the better fit for general audiences; the reverse error, using "tempos" in a highly technical classical score analysis, is less common but can read as slightly less precise to specialist readers. Writers should also avoid confusing "tempo" (the speed of a piece) with "rhythm" (the pattern of beats within it), two related but distinct musical concepts frequently conflated in casual writing about music.

The wider pattern

"Tempo" contrasts directly with "piano": both are Italian musical loanwords of similar vintage, but "tempo" kept a living Italian plural through continued specialist use, while "piano" regularized completely, showing how a word's ongoing use within its originating professional field can preserve a foreign plural much longer than general popularity alone would predict.

Examples

Related plurals

All plurals